Frontera NorteSur
On June 10, hundreds if not thousands of people from Mexican non-governmental organizations are expected to gather in Ciudad Juarez to sign a pact that organizers say is the first step in bringing a halt to the so-called drug war and putting Mexico on a new road to peace, justice and democracy.
“Paradoxically, Ciudad Juarez, this city broken by institutional abandonment, by a neo-liberal economic policy and by the disdain of the government for decades, could be the hopeful beginning of this citizen movement that is so needed at the national level in order to provoke change, to initiate a new stage in the life of the country,” wrote Proceso columnist Jose Gil Olmos.
In truth, no one can say with any certainty what will come of the movement inspired by poet Javier Sicilia, who transformed the murder of his son in the state of Morelos last March, into a national crusade for reform and national reconstruction that’s stirred the imagination of many Mexicans.
But a trip back in history reveals a trajectory that leads straight to Ciudad Juarez.
The date, June 10, is an important one in the Mexican memory. On June 10, 1971, a big squad of goons known as the halcones, trained and coordinated by the Mexican military, viciously attacked a pro-democracy march of 10,000 students in Mexico City, killing dozens and injuring many others.
The perpetrators of the Corpus Christ Massacre, or simply the halconazo as it is commonly referred to in Mexico, had been used by the Mexican government since the late 1960s to quash rising opposition to the one-party rule of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). Some of the halcones were sent to the US for training.
Guided by the anti-communism of the Cold War, Washington was quite aware of the Mexican government’s use of torture and killing to stamp out opposition, and collaborated with its junior partner to make sure any hints of “subversion” on the southern border were carefully monitored and taken care of in due time.
In essence, Washington’s Mexico policy was an extension of its domestic one. The early 1970s were the height of the COINTELPRO program against the Black liberation, Chicano, Native American and other movements. Among other tactics, COINTELPRO included illegal break-ins, wire-tapping, phony legal charges and the use of “snitch jackets” designed to disrupt and divide opposition forces.
A prime target of COINTELPRO, Vietnam veteran and Los Angeles Black Panther Party leader Geronimo Pratt spent 27 years in prison for a murder he did not commit. Pratt died in Tanzania last week at the age of 63.
National Security Archive researcher Kate Doyle, who has reviewed numerous US government documents related to Mexico, once contacted former US Ambassador Patrick J. Lucey, who served during the Carter years in the late 1970s. Even in an era of official human rights policy, Washington’s interests in Mexico were trade, migration, oil and drugs, Lucey told Doyle. In short, the same priorities as now.
The halconazo stoked the wheels of armed resistance to the PRI government, which had been boiling ever since similar government-sponsored killings and massacres in Chihuahua, Guerrero and Mexico City in the 1960s.
In his landmark book on the Mexican intelligence services, La Charola, author Sergio Aguayo quotes the writings of Gustavo Hireles, a former leader of the guerrilla September 23rd Communist League.
In reference to the halconazo, Hireles wrote: “It hit the people like a bomb. It was the confirmation, if one was needed, that these ‘sons of bitches’ had no cure….”
In response to the guerrilla upsurge, Mexico City unleashed the Dirty War.
Although the Dirty War extended across virtually the entire country, ground zero was in the state of Guerrero. In the shadows of the then-trendy jet-set resort of Acapulco, armed opposition led by schoolteachers Genaro Vazquez and Lucio Cabanas garnered mass support.
Hundreds of people were kidnapped never to be seen again, villages locked down or ransacked and entire families targeted for torture, interrogation and possible execution by government security forces.
Early on, Washington judged Cabanas’ movement “terrorist.” Today, many in Guerrero consider Vazquez and Cabanas fallen heroes; several years ago, the Guerrero State Congress, including members of the PRI against which Cabanas fought so fiercely, rendered a posthumous recognition to the slain guerrilla leader, whose bust now stands in the town plaza of Atoyac de Alvarez.
As COINTELRO raged away north of the border and the Dirty War south of it, the Nixon administration opened another front when it declared the war on drugs 40 years ago.
The Halconazo, the Guerrero scorched-earth campaign and other atrocities of the Dirty War were investigated by a special prosecutor appointed by the administration of President Vicente Fox. The stated goal was to hold officials accountable for human rights violations. But six years passed and no successful prosecutions resulted.
Unlike other Latin American countries, Mexico did not undergo an official historical reckoning with its recent past of repression and violence.
“Mexico still has no idea on how to pursue a legal process against the ones responsible for the Dirty War,” Doyle was quoted at a presentation in Guerrero last year.
With the guerrilla opposition temporarily quelled (an even bigger one arose in the 1990s), members of the security forces engaged in other pursuits. For example, before it was disbanded in the 1980s, the Federal Security Directorate, Mexico’s equivalent of a combined FBI-CIA super-agency, was known to control the illegal drug trade. Time and again, current and former police and soldiers have popped up in the ranks of organized crime.
Meantime, the US trained thousands of new Mexican police and soldiers.
A free trade agreement was signed with Mexico, many new US factories relocated south of the border, the national PRI government changed to the PAN government and a broadened, binational anti-drug campaign was agreed to between Washington and Mexico City in the form of the Merida Initiative, which promised yet more training of Mexican security forces, new military equipment and high-level collaboration.
Embraced by US employers, millions of impoverished Mexicans headed north to pick fruits and vegetables for busy US households, clean rooms for hurried US travelers and build new homes for anxious buyers ready to live the American Dream.
But when Mexicans suddenly became discardable in the post-2008 economy, hundreds of thousands of them were simply deported back home. And the country they came back to was arguably even in much worse shape than the one they had left to pursue their own version of the American Dream.
Commerce between the US and Mexico exploded, and not only in legal goods.
Despite the “Just Say No” rhetoric of the Reagan years, millions and millions of Americans shot heroin into their veins, sniffed cocaine up their noses and blew pot smoke into the face of the law.
In a recent US speech, poet Sicilia laid bare the cross-border drug connection: “While in the US, people like Charlie Sheen or Paris Hilton glorify and promote the consumption of drugs in their shows and in the media, we are obliged to pursue the producers. While the US has a legal industry worse than drugs-the arms industry-that arms the forces of the Mexican state as well as those of organized crime, we provide the dead bodies, the suffering and the fear on a daily basis. While North American banks and institutions collude with Mexican banks and institutions that launder money, we the citizens of Mexico live in misery and in terror.”
Contemporary media reports tend to frame the Mexican drug violence as if it began in 2006, with an estimated 40,000 people murdered and possibly as many as 10,000 forcibly disappeared just in the last five years. But the historical toll is far greater, if one goes back a few decades and includes other bouts of narco-violence as well as the political violence that preceded it as part of the bigger picture.
In the long view, the murmurs of the disappeared and the ghosts of the dead from the Dirty War are almost audible and nearly visible in today’s mass graves of Tamaulipas, Durango and Coahuila.
To turn the tide, Javier Sicilia’s movement proposes six basic changes.
They include an end to impunity and violence, an attack on the financial structures of organized crime, special attention to the needs of youth, participatory democracy and democratization of the mass media.
On June 10, the 40th anniversary of the halconazo, representatives of hundreds of non-governmental organizations plan to sign the six-point pact in Ciudad Juarez, the city where Benito Juarez found refuge from French invaders in the 1860s and the place where a strategic victory for rebels was scored in the 1910 Revolution.
The goal of the movement and its pact is to awaken civil society as a conscious agent of change and non-violently reassert the force of the citizenry in a political landscape dominated by organized political parties, shadowy syndicates and powerful business groups of different stripes.
It is unclear whether the pact will serve as the springboard for dialogue between the new movement and the powers-that-be.
In a broad sense, however, the nascent movement is more akin to the civil uprisings that have rocked Egypt, Tunisia, Spain and even Madison, Wisconsin, this year.
The “June 10th Movement” of Javier Sicilia and his allies shares characteristics of what Latin American political analyst Raul Zibechi defines as revolts of the “common people” that side-step traditional political structures and establish “horizontal political relations, in self-controlled spaces, autonomous and sovereign in which nobody imposes and orders the collective.”
On Saturday, June 4, Sicilia and several hundred people left Cuernavaca, Morelos, on the Caravan for Peace with Justice and Dignity destined for Ciudad Juarez. Along the way, on a veritable tour of death and destruction, they plan stops in other cities devastated by the so-called drug war.
They will likely hear many stories of pain, personal tragedy and unspeakable horror. But they will give out their call for a new republic, a society where violence and corruption are curbed, human rights respected, young people accorded the chance for a dignified future, and the “common people” given their voice in national affairs.
The caravan is finding common ground in the US, as the issues raised in the six-point pact are resonating in the US just as they are to Mexico. On the morning of June 11, the El Paso-based Peace and Justice without Borders plans an event featuring Sicilia in the downtown plaza of Texas border city.
In addition to supporting the six-point pact, activists demand that the US put into practice international humanitarian law and facilitate the stay of Mexicans fleeing violence and seeking political asylum.
“Certainly, today’s Mexico, so destroyed and so hurt does not allow hope,” Sicilia said in his recent US speech. Sicilia then spoke of a conversation between Napoleon and Fontanes, and the thoughts of Albert Camus, in offering an alternative option for the future.
“At the end of the day, a good rule of conduct is to think that the free spirit always has reason and always winds up triumphing,” Sicilia said, “because the day when reason disappears will be the day humanity as a whole stops having it and the history of mankind loses its sense.”
Frontera NorteSur: on-line, U.S.-Mexico border news Center for Latin American and Border Studies New Mexico State University Las Cruces, New Mexico